Ponding authorPublished: 15 August 2006 Harm Reduction Journal 2006, 3:25 doi:ten.1186/1477-7517-3-Received: 27 July 2006 Accepted:

Ponding authorPublished: 15 August 2006 Harm Reduction Journal 2006, 3:25 doi:ten.1186/1477-7517-3-Received: 27 July 2006 Accepted: 15 AugustThis write-up is available from: http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/25 ?2006 Kerr; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This really is an Open Access write-up distributed PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20710118/reviews/discuss/all/type/journal_article beneath the terms on the Inventive Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, offered the original operate is correctly cited.AbstractThroughout the majority of the planet, the key response to the health and social impacts of MedChemExpress BAY1217389 illicit drug use has been to intensify the enforcement of drug laws. The consequences of this policy method include an unprecedented development in prison populations and growing concerns relating to drugrelated harms inside prisons and without, which includes elevated danger of HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) infection. This has led to calls from public overall health and prisoner advocacy groups to prison authorities to enhance well being services available within the neighborhood and these offered to prisoners. While considerable progress has been made with respect to the expanding implementation of HIV and HCV prevention measures within some nations’ prisons, the case of Scott Ortiz illuminates a brand new set of challenges for prisoners and their advocates as judges normally have a faulty understanding of public wellness arguments and information. Within this case we see one such instance where a judge acts in methods not rooted in sound public health proof or practice to make a perverse outcome that violates each sound healthcare and judicial objectives.BackgroundThroughout most of the world, the major response to the health and social impacts of illicit drug use has been to intensify the enforcement of drug laws in an effort to limit the supply and use of illicit drugs [1]. The consequences of this policy approach contain an unprecedented development in prison populations and rising concerns relating to drug-related harms inside prisons [2]. In recent years, incarceration has been connected with an array of harms, such as enhanced risk of HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) infection that final results from injecting that occurs in prisons in the absence of efficient prevention measures for example syringe exchange programs [3]. This has led to calls from public wellness and prisoner advocacy groups to prison authorities to honor the ‘principle of equivalence’which states that well being solutions readily available within the neighborhood must also be produced equally offered to prisoners [3]. Even though considerable progress has been created with respect to the growing implementation of HIV and HCV prevention measures inside prisons, the case of Scott Ortiz illuminates a brand new set of challenges for prisoners and their advocates. Mr. Ortiz is described as a former injection drug user who had been convicted of burglary. Upon conclusion of Mr. Ortiz’s trial, the presiding judge imposed an extraordinary and lengthy sentence according to a public well being argument that was not rooted in sound public overall health evidence or practice. In quick, Mr. Ortiz was convicted as a implies of decreasing the likelihood that he may well transmit his infectious diseases to other people through illicit drug use. Aside from becoming tragic, this selection was alsoPage 1 of(page number not for citation purposes)Harm Reduction Journal 2006, three:http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/ironic given what’s known regarding the high threat injecting environments withi.