Ntinuant universal (IC or DC), two. to an occurrent universal (O) 3. to some portion

Ntinuant universal (IC or DC), two. to an occurrent universal (O) 3. to some portion of reality that is definitely described via some logical mixture of terms representing such universals (marked here with `POR’). Figure two consists of an overview of your entities which we think will will need to play a foundational part within a future OMD alongside the entities already represented in BFO and OGMS. To say that the patient features a mental illness will be to say that there is certainly some Mental Disorder instance in the patient. This really is, in OGMS terms, the physical basis in the corresponding Illness instance. As a a part of the organism it truly is, just like the organism itself, an independent continuant (IC). This Disease instance is really a certain disposition (DC), which inheres within the corresponding disorder within the patient, and is itself the potentiality for (and is realized in) situations of Pathological Mental Method (O) of particular procedure varieties, by way of example as manifested inside the type of signs and symptoms. Commonly, a number of patterns of such processes – a number of presentations, in other words, or what we shall officially contact various Disease Courses (O) – will be associated with all the identical Disorder form, by way of example in reflection in the presence or absence of pharmaceutical or other interventions, of variations in environmental influence, and so forth.Figure two Foundational entities for an ontology of mental illness. Shape coding: terms in squared boxes are from feeder ontologies for example BFO and OGMS; terms in rounded boxes PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21173589 are particular towards the Ontology of Mental Illness. Color coding: L1 continuants (initial order entities) are depicted in yellow, L2/L3 continuants (representations) in orange; processes are depicted in green, abbreviations for disjunctions are in light blue. Red, unlabeled arrows indicate subsumption; black arrows are labeled as outlined by the relation they depict, the label being either beneath or correct in the arrows. Some clear relationships happen to be left out to help keep the figure intelligible.Ceusters and Smith Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2010, 1:10 http://www.jbiomedsem.com/content/1/1/Page 13 ofIn addition for the disorder-related entities will be the numerous SB756050 representations of those and other entities, not only on the side in the clinician, but in addition – and this can be a phenomenon of exceptional importance in the case of mental disease – around the side in the patient [14]. We assume, with OGMS, that Cognitive Representations – and also other L2 entities like beliefs, feelings and desires – have a physical basis (within the brain), within the relevant components of which there take place processes of specific sorts which include: activations of neurons, formation of synapses involving cells, and flow of electrons (measurable, probably, by signifies of encephalograms). For comfort in what follows we shall get in touch with the corresponding physical components inside the patient organism – components that are involved in each mental illness and standard cognitive functioning – `mental functioning related anatomical structures’. A cognitive representation can take part in processes of distinct sorts. It can be generated: a cat crosses your path and causes your visual system to induce a configuration – a mental image – within your brain that allows you to describe the cat . It might be sustained: your mental image with the cat is kept in memory and allows you to describe the cat at later times. Or it is actually modified: you come to be conscious that what you thought was a cat was not in actual fact a cat at all, but rather a raccoon. A cognitive.