No education 1126 (17.16) Primary 1840 (28.03) Secondary 3004 (45.78) Protein kinase inhibitor H-89 dihydrochloride web Higher 593 (9.03) Mothers occupation House maker/No 4651 (70.86) formal occupation Poultry/Farming/ 1117 (17.02) Cultivation Qualified 795 (12.12) Number of kids Significantly less than 3 4174 (63.60) 3 And above 2389 (36.40) Quantity of kids <5 years old One 4213 (64.19) Two and above 2350 (35.81) Division Barisal 373 (5.68) Chittagong 1398 (21.30) Dhaka 2288 (34.87) Khulna 498 (7.60)(62.43, 64.76) (35.24, 37.57) (84.76, 86.46) (13.54, 15.24) (66.06, 68.33) (31.67, 33.94) (25.63, 25.93) (12.70, 14.35) (77.30, 79.29) (7.55, 8.88) (16.27, 18.09) (26.96, 29.13) (44.57, 46.98) (8.36, 9.78) (69.75, 71.95) (16.13, 17.95) (11.35, 12.93) (62.43, 64.76) (35.24, 37.57)2901 (44.19) 3663 (55.81)(43.00, 45.40) (54.60, 57.00)6417 (97.77) 146 (2.23) 4386 (66.83) 2177 (33.17) 4541 (69.19) 2022 (30.81)(97.39, 98.10) (1.90, 2.61) (65.68, 67.96) (32.04, 34.32) (68.06, 70.29) (29.71, 31.94)Categorized based on BDHS report, 2014.the households, diarrheal prevalence was higher in the lower socioeconomic status households (see Table 2). Such a disparity was not found for type of residence. A high prevalence was observed in households that had no access to electronic media (5.91 vs 5.47) and source of drinking water (6.73 vs 5.69) and had unimproved toilet facilities (6.78 vs 5.18).Factors Associated With Childhood DiarrheaTable 2 shows the factors influencing diarrheal prevalence. For this purpose, 2 models were considered: using bivariate logistic regression analysis (model I) and using multivariate logistic regression analysis (model II) to control for any possible confounding effects. We used both unINK-128 Adjusted and adjusted ORs to address the effects of single a0023781 variables. In model I, many variables for instance the age in the kids, age-specific height, age and occupations in the mothers, divisionwise distribution, and type of toilet facilities were found to become substantially connected with the prevalence of(63.02, 65.34) (34.66, 36.98) (five.15, six.27) (20.33, 22.31) (33.72, 36.03) (6.98, 8.26) (continued)Sarker et alTable two. Prevalence and Related Variables of Childhood Diarrhea.a Prevalence of Diarrhea, n ( ) 75 (six.25) 121 (8.62) 68 (five.19) 48 (three.71) 62 (4.62) 201 (5.88) 174 (five.53) Model I Unadjusted OR (95 CI) 1.73*** (1.19, 2.50) 2.45*** (1.74, three.45) 1.42* (0.97, 2.07) 1.00 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) 1.07 (0.87, 1.31) 1.00 Model II Adjusted OR (95 CI) 1.88*** (1.27, 2.77) two.44*** (1.72, 3.47) 1.46* (1.00, two.14) 1.00 1.31 (0.88, 1.93) 1.06 (0.85, 1.31) 1.Variables Child’s age (in months) <12 12-23 24-35 36-47 (reference) 48-59 Sex of children Male Female (reference) Nutritional index HAZ Normal (reference) Stunting WHZ Normal (reference) Wasting WAZ Normal (reference) Underweight Mother's age (years) Less than 20 20-34 Above 34 (reference) Mother's education level No education Primary Secondary Higher (reference) Mother's occupation Homemaker/No formal occupation Poultry/Farming/Cultivation (reference) Professional Number of children Less than 3 (reference) 3 And above Number of children <5 years old One (reference) Two and above Division Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur (reference) Sylhet Residence Urban (reference) Rural200 (4.80) 175 (7.31) 326 (5.80) 49 (5.18) 255 journal.pone.0169185 (5.79) 120 (5.56) 54 (six.06) 300 (5.84) 21 (three.88) 70 (six.19) 108 (five.89) 169 (five.63) 28 (4.68) 298 (six.40) 38 (3.37) 40 (4.98) 231 (five.54) 144 (6.02) 231 (5.48) 144 (six.13) 26 (7.01) 93 (6.68) 160 (six.98) 17 (3.36) 25 (three.65) 12 (1.81).No education 1126 (17.16) Primary 1840 (28.03) Secondary 3004 (45.78) Larger 593 (9.03) Mothers occupation Home maker/No 4651 (70.86) formal occupation Poultry/Farming/ 1117 (17.02) Cultivation Skilled 795 (12.12) Quantity of children Less than 3 4174 (63.60) three And above 2389 (36.40) Number of young children <5 years old One 4213 (64.19) Two and above 2350 (35.81) Division Barisal 373 (5.68) Chittagong 1398 (21.30) Dhaka 2288 (34.87) Khulna 498 (7.60)(62.43, 64.76) (35.24, 37.57) (84.76, 86.46) (13.54, 15.24) (66.06, 68.33) (31.67, 33.94) (25.63, 25.93) (12.70, 14.35) (77.30, 79.29) (7.55, 8.88) (16.27, 18.09) (26.96, 29.13) (44.57, 46.98) (8.36, 9.78) (69.75, 71.95) (16.13, 17.95) (11.35, 12.93) (62.43, 64.76) (35.24, 37.57)2901 (44.19) 3663 (55.81)(43.00, 45.40) (54.60, 57.00)6417 (97.77) 146 (2.23) 4386 (66.83) 2177 (33.17) 4541 (69.19) 2022 (30.81)(97.39, 98.10) (1.90, 2.61) (65.68, 67.96) (32.04, 34.32) (68.06, 70.29) (29.71, 31.94)Categorized based on BDHS report, 2014.the households, diarrheal prevalence was higher in the lower socioeconomic status households (see Table 2). Such a disparity was not found for type of residence. A high prevalence was observed in households that had no access to electronic media (5.91 vs 5.47) and source of drinking water (6.73 vs 5.69) and had unimproved toilet facilities (6.78 vs 5.18).Factors Associated With Childhood DiarrheaTable 2 shows the factors influencing diarrheal prevalence. For this purpose, 2 models were considered: using bivariate logistic regression analysis (model I) and using multivariate logistic regression analysis (model II) to control for any possible confounding effects. We used both unadjusted and adjusted ORs to address the effects of single a0023781 aspects. In model I, various elements for instance the age of your young children, age-specific height, age and occupations from the mothers, divisionwise distribution, and variety of toilet facilities were found to be considerably related to the prevalence of(63.02, 65.34) (34.66, 36.98) (5.15, six.27) (20.33, 22.31) (33.72, 36.03) (6.98, 8.26) (continued)Sarker et alTable 2. Prevalence and Related Things of Childhood Diarrhea.a Prevalence of Diarrhea, n ( ) 75 (six.25) 121 (8.62) 68 (5.19) 48 (3.71) 62 (4.62) 201 (five.88) 174 (five.53) Model I Unadjusted OR (95 CI) 1.73*** (1.19, 2.50) 2.45*** (1.74, three.45) 1.42* (0.97, 2.07) 1.00 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) 1.07 (0.87, 1.31) 1.00 Model II Adjusted OR (95 CI) 1.88*** (1.27, two.77) 2.44*** (1.72, three.47) 1.46* (1.00, two.14) 1.00 1.31 (0.88, 1.93) 1.06 (0.85, 1.31) 1.Variables Child’s age (in months) <12 12-23 24-35 36-47 (reference) 48-59 Sex of children Male Female (reference) Nutritional index HAZ Normal (reference) Stunting WHZ Normal (reference) Wasting WAZ Normal (reference) Underweight Mother's age (years) Less than 20 20-34 Above 34 (reference) Mother's education level No education Primary Secondary Higher (reference) Mother's occupation Homemaker/No formal occupation Poultry/Farming/Cultivation (reference) Professional Number of children Less than 3 (reference) 3 And above Number of children <5 years old One (reference) Two and above Division Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur (reference) Sylhet Residence Urban (reference) Rural200 (4.80) 175 (7.31) 326 (5.80) 49 (5.18) 255 journal.pone.0169185 (5.79) 120 (5.56) 54 (six.06) 300 (five.84) 21 (3.88) 70 (six.19) 108 (5.89) 169 (five.63) 28 (4.68) 298 (six.40) 38 (three.37) 40 (4.98) 231 (5.54) 144 (six.02) 231 (5.48) 144 (6.13) 26 (7.01) 93 (six.68) 160 (6.98) 17 (3.36) 25 (3.65) 12 (1.81).
Related Posts
Bromochloroacetonitrile
Product Name : BromochloroacetonitrileDescription:Bromochloroacetonitrile is a by-product of the chlorine disinfection of water containing natural organic material. Bromochloroacetonitrile possesses direct acting mutagenic activity and is capable of inducing DNA strand breakage.CAS: 83463-62-1Molecular Weight:154.39Formula: C2HBrClNChemical Name: 2-bromo-2-chloroacetonitrileSmiles : N#CC(Cl)BrInChiKey: BMWPPNAUMLRKML-UHFFFAOYSA-NInChi : InChI=1S/C2HBrClN/c3-2(4)1-5/h2HPurity: ≥98% (or refer to the Certificate of Analysis)Shipping Condition: Shipped under ambient temperature as […]
Actors KGF and IGF-2 plus a related trend for IL-1 and HGF. This enhanced expression
Actors KGF and IGF-2 plus a related trend for IL-1 and HGF. This enhanced expression in vitro fits to the greater expression of KGF [23], IL-1 [37] and HGF [27] detected in vivo in cholesteatoma tissue when when compared with auditory canal skin. In actual fact, IL-1 expression may be localized in cells from the […]
Easured around the male cadaver's torso location. attributed to cadaverEasured about the male cadaver's torso
Easured around the male cadaver’s torso location. attributed to cadaverEasured about the male cadaver’s torso area. attributed to cadaver 18-16 being frozen although 18-17 had been refrigerated. Cadavers wore socks and two.six.3. on alternate feet to shoes Sample Collection allow comparison of DNA yield of samples with and without footwear (Figure 1). Cadavers had been […]