Ined in culture by continuous subculturing.DNA sequence Title Loaded From File analysis of goat GLUT1 and GLUTThe analysis of the cDNA sequences was conducted using the computer program DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST site Table 1. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and RT-qPCR.Detection of GLUT1, GLUT12, sweet1 and amino acid transporters (AATs) gene expression by RT-qPCRTotal RNA from cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1GLUT1, pcDNA3.1-GLUT12 and pcDNA3.1 was obtained, and the 18S and 28S rRNA bands were evaluated following agarose gel electrophoresis. The GeneJETTM RNA Purification Kit (Fermentas) was used with oligo dT and 6-random primers to reverse-transcribe 5 mg of total RNA into cDNA. To determine the gene expression profiles, 2 mL of the cDNA was amplified in a 20 mL reaction mixture containing 10 mL SYBR PremixTM Ex Taq (TaKaRa China CA), 0.4 mL ROX dye II and specific primers (0.4 mM each of the forward and reverse gene-specific primer; Table. 1) using an ABI 7500 instrument. The data are reported as values normalized to the housekeeping gene (b-actin) to account for repeated measures. The differences between the means at each stage of development were determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.Primers names GLUT1-F GLUT1-R GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F GLUT12-R GLUT12-F1 GLUT12-R1 GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F2 GLUT12-R2 SWEET1-F SWEET1-R SLC1A5-F SLC1A5-R SLC7A5-F SLC7A5-R SLC3A2-F SLC3A2-R ?actin-F ?actin-RType Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward ReverseSequences 5′-GCTAGCATGGAGCCCACCAGCAAG -3′ 5′-AAGCTTTCACACTTGGGAATCAGCTCC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-GGAAAAGTGACCGCTCGTG-3′ 5′-TGTCCTGGTAGGCAAAGAACTG-3′ 5′-CTCGAGATGGTACCTGTTGAAAACGCAG -3′ 5′-CTCGAGTTAGATCTCTGAAGAAAGCTGC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-TACTCTCCTGTCGTCTGT-3′ 5′-ATGATGGTGGCTCTTCTC-3′ 5′-GTGCTCCTTCAGACTACA-3′ 5′-GTGGTGAGAGGTACATACT-3′ 5′-CCAAGGGACTCTCAAACATTTCA-3′ 5′-CGGAGGCTAGAACTTTCAAGAA-3′ 5′-ATCGCCGTCTCCTTCTGG-3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGGTCGCTTACG-3′ 5′-GCTGCTGCTGCTCTTCTG-3′ 5′-TGCCACCATCTCTGCTCTG-3′ 5′-CCAACCGTGAGAAGATGA-3′ 5′-CAGAGTCCATGACAATGC-3’Detection of glucose absorption and lactose synthesisThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were passaged at the same density in 6-well plates, and the cell culture medium and the total protein content of the cells were sampled at 24 h and 48 h. The glucose and lactose levels in the culture media were determined using the Glucose Assay Kit II and Lactose Assay Kit (Biovision, CA, USA), respectively. The absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 450 or 570 nm. The amount of absorbed glucose or lactose, as determined based on the difference before and after incubation, was expressed as mg of glucose/mg protein or ng of lactose/mg protein.Detection of GLUT1 and GLUT12 in GMGE cellsThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were grown on coverslips, fixed with 4 paraformaldehyde for 30 min Title Loaded From File anddoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065013.tFunctional Analysis of GLUT1 and GLUTFigure 1. Identification and construction of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 and pcDNA3.1-GLUT12. (A) Identification of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 by digestion with Nhe I and Hind III. 1676428 M1: DL5000 DNA Marker, pCG1: inserted into pcDNA3.1, pCG1 Nhe I + Hind III: digested with Nhe I and Hind III. (B) PCR analysis using primers GLUT1-F/GLUT1-R. M2.Ined in culture by continuous subculturing.DNA sequence analysis of goat GLUT1 and GLUTThe analysis of the cDNA sequences was conducted using the computer program DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST site Table 1. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and RT-qPCR.Detection of GLUT1, GLUT12, sweet1 and amino acid transporters (AATs) gene expression by RT-qPCRTotal RNA from cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1GLUT1, pcDNA3.1-GLUT12 and pcDNA3.1 was obtained, and the 18S and 28S rRNA bands were evaluated following agarose gel electrophoresis. The GeneJETTM RNA Purification Kit (Fermentas) was used with oligo dT and 6-random primers to reverse-transcribe 5 mg of total RNA into cDNA. To determine the gene expression profiles, 2 mL of the cDNA was amplified in a 20 mL reaction mixture containing 10 mL SYBR PremixTM Ex Taq (TaKaRa China CA), 0.4 mL ROX dye II and specific primers (0.4 mM each of the forward and reverse gene-specific primer; Table. 1) using an ABI 7500 instrument. The data are reported as values normalized to the housekeeping gene (b-actin) to account for repeated measures. The differences between the means at each stage of development were determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.Primers names GLUT1-F GLUT1-R GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F GLUT12-R GLUT12-F1 GLUT12-R1 GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F2 GLUT12-R2 SWEET1-F SWEET1-R SLC1A5-F SLC1A5-R SLC7A5-F SLC7A5-R SLC3A2-F SLC3A2-R ?actin-F ?actin-RType Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward ReverseSequences 5′-GCTAGCATGGAGCCCACCAGCAAG -3′ 5′-AAGCTTTCACACTTGGGAATCAGCTCC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-GGAAAAGTGACCGCTCGTG-3′ 5′-TGTCCTGGTAGGCAAAGAACTG-3′ 5′-CTCGAGATGGTACCTGTTGAAAACGCAG -3′ 5′-CTCGAGTTAGATCTCTGAAGAAAGCTGC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-TACTCTCCTGTCGTCTGT-3′ 5′-ATGATGGTGGCTCTTCTC-3′ 5′-GTGCTCCTTCAGACTACA-3′ 5′-GTGGTGAGAGGTACATACT-3′ 5′-CCAAGGGACTCTCAAACATTTCA-3′ 5′-CGGAGGCTAGAACTTTCAAGAA-3′ 5′-ATCGCCGTCTCCTTCTGG-3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGGTCGCTTACG-3′ 5′-GCTGCTGCTGCTCTTCTG-3′ 5′-TGCCACCATCTCTGCTCTG-3′ 5′-CCAACCGTGAGAAGATGA-3′ 5′-CAGAGTCCATGACAATGC-3’Detection of glucose absorption and lactose synthesisThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were passaged at the same density in 6-well plates, and the cell culture medium and the total protein content of the cells were sampled at 24 h and 48 h. The glucose and lactose levels in the culture media were determined using the Glucose Assay Kit II and Lactose Assay Kit (Biovision, CA, USA), respectively. The absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 450 or 570 nm. The amount of absorbed glucose or lactose, as determined based on the difference before and after incubation, was expressed as mg of glucose/mg protein or ng of lactose/mg protein.Detection of GLUT1 and GLUT12 in GMGE cellsThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were grown on coverslips, fixed with 4 paraformaldehyde for 30 min anddoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065013.tFunctional Analysis of GLUT1 and GLUTFigure 1. Identification and construction of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 and pcDNA3.1-GLUT12. (A) Identification of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 by digestion with Nhe I and Hind III. 1676428 M1: DL5000 DNA Marker, pCG1: inserted into pcDNA3.1, pCG1 Nhe I + Hind III: digested with Nhe I and Hind III. (B) PCR analysis using primers GLUT1-F/GLUT1-R. M2.
Related Posts
The lesion studies printed in 1972 demonstrated that electric powered destruction of the SCN in rats led to a reduction of circadian rhythmicity [eleven,twelve]
Most dwelling organisms show behavioral and physiological rhythms in response to the every day improvements imposed by rotation of the earth. The rhythms are driven by internal molecular clocks and can be reset by environmental gentle-darkish cycles. The main molecular clock is composed of transcriptional activators and repressors that are assembled into comments loops [one,two]. […]
Ce bullying in schools in the U.S. on levels of
Ce bullying in schools in the U.S. on levels of homophobia and risk behaviors among adolescent MSM. Another example is to study reproductive health CPI-455MedChemExpress CPI-455 clinics in high schools, both upstream on the macro level by examining the political systems and actors that lead to the establishment of the clinics, and downstream, at the […]
And PMA, the former group had additional impacts, observed with the fainter marker with the
And PMA, the former group had additional impacts, observed with the fainter marker with the proteins than the later group. In protein evaluation, actin, being a protein that was not involved with collagen, and did not show any effects with PMA or EAE addition, indicating that actin had no involvements with other proteins [20,21]. The […]