Sity distributions, seemed to depend on the neighborhood place. We attributed
Sity distributions, seemed to depend on the neighborhood place. We attributed this to the Bragg peak broadening through the polarization switching from the typical structure, as shown in Figures 2a and 3b. Soon after the polarization, the switching completed intensity t = 60 s, and typical structure, as redistributions 3b. attributed h and at around maximum of thethe dynamic intensity shown in FigurewereBoth the Qto the Qv below the the field shared certain position dependences, forming the heterogeneous reorientations of AC nanodomains. structure, which consisted of nanodomains with several lattice constants and orientations.Figure 5. Time (t) dependences of (a) voltage (red) and existing (blue) involving two electrodes on Figure 5. Time (t) dependences of (a) voltage (red) and present (blue) between two electrodes around the MCC950 site crystal surfaces, and (b) Q and (c) Qv at neighborhood areas of z = 0.0, five.0, and ten.0 within the the crystal surfaces, and (b) h h and (c) v at nearby places of z = 0.0, 5.0, and ten.0 m in the time-resolved nanobeam XRD for neighborhood structure beneath AC field. Red and blue dashed lines Charybdotoxin Data Sheet indicate time-resolved nanobeam XRD for neighborhood structure below AC field. Red and blue dashed lines indicate times when the voltage becomes zero at t 0 along with the current becomes the maximum at t = 24 s, instances when the voltage becomes zero at t == 0 plus the present becomes the maximum at t = 24 , respectively. respectively.3.three. Static Neighborhood Structure beneath DC Field Figure 6a,b shows, respectively, both the DC field dependences with the Qh and Qv one-dimensional profiles with the 002 Bragg peak by means of the intensity maxima, which were diffracted from a regional area on the crystal surface at z = 0.0 inside the experimental layout in Figure 1b. The corresponding Qh and Qv profiles at z = 5.0 and ten.0 are also shown in Figure 6c . The DC field was changed from E = -8.0 to 8.0 kV/cm (-80 to 80 V in voltage). The field dependences of Qh and Qv from E = -2.0 to eight.0 kV/cm at each regional place are shown in Figure 7a,b, respectively. Discontinuous peak shifts along Qh with intensity redistributions had been observed involving E = two and 3 kV/cm (20 and 30 V in voltage). This behavior is explained by the switching with the rhombohedral lattice angle from 90 – to 90 + ( = 0.08 ), accompanied by the polarization switching, and also the redistribution in the polar nanodomains with a heterogeneous structure. The moment-to-moment modify in Qh , because of the discontinuous lattice deformation, was detected inside the time-resolved nanobeam XRD under AC field, as shown in Figure 5b. The DC field dependences of Qv were consistent with all the time dependence of Qv below the AC field, as shown in Figure 5c. The field-induced tensile lattice strain calculated fromCrystals 2021, 11,8 ofQv was s = 1.3 10-3 at E = eight.0 kV/cm. The piezoelectric constant estimated in the tensile lattice strain was d = s/E = 1.6 103 pC/N, which was consistent together with the bulk Crystals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER Review of 12 piezoelectric constant. While both Qh and Qv have been beneath the zero and DC fields,9some position dependences have been observed, resulting within the heterogeneous structure consisting of nanodomains with a variety of lattice constants and orientations.Figure six. DC field dependences of Q and Q one-dimensional profiles of your 002 Bragg peak Figure 6. DC field dependences of Qh hand Qv vone-dimensional profiles of the 002 Bragg peak by way of the intensity maxima at = (a,b) 0.0, (c,d) 5.0, and (e,f) ten.0 within the nanobeam XRD for through.