Rmal vision. BVF individuals have been compared to 22 healthier volunteers matched on
Rmal vision. BVF individuals were in comparison to 22 wholesome volunteers matched on age, sex and education level (9 females and 3 males, age: 58 2 years, education: 5 3 years). Healthful participants were all MedChemExpress TCS-OX2-29 righthanded, (laterality quotient: 94 3 ), had typical or correctedtonormal vision, and no history of vestibular, neurological, or psychiatric disease. Implicit viewpoint taking task (IPT activity). Visual stimuli consisted of a colored 3D rendering of a room with 3 visible walls. The left and suitable walls had been yellow and contained from 0 to 3 blue balls aligned horizontally. Within the middle in the room and in the center with the screen, an avatar was shown sitting on a cube placed on the space floor. Two sets of pictures were designed: female avatars have been always shown to female participants, and male avatars had been normally shown to male participants. The avatar faced the left or appropriate wall of the 3D space. The spatial arrangement on the balls was manipulated to create circumstances where the participant and avatar could “see” the identical quantity of balls around the walls (i.e congruent viewpoint), or possibly 
a distinctive variety of balls (i.e incongruent viewpoint) (Fig ). In total, for each female and male avatars and for both avatar orientations (i.e facing the left or proper wall), 0 visual stimuli had been made to balance the amount of trials with congruent and incongruent viewpoints (following procedures from Ref. [24]). Visual presentation was controlled, and responses were collected by utilizing PsychoPy2 v.82.0 [48]. Each trial began with the presentation of a white fixation cross on a black background for 750 ms. This was followed by the presentation with the query “How numerous blue balls do you see” for 500 ms and also the presentation of a number (0, , two or three) for 000 ms. Then, one of several visual scenes was presented. Participants had been instructed to indicate as promptly and accurately as you possibly can whether or not the number of balls they saw matched the number specified soon after the question. The response time was not restricted. Participants pushed certainly one of two buttons on a keyboard to respond: half with the participants had to press a button with their appropriate index finger PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479345 to answer “yes” or another button with their appropriate middle index finger to answer “no”; the other participants had a reverse configuration for the response buttons. As soon as participants pressed a button, the visual scene disappeared plus the subsequent trial began. While participants had to count the amount of balls in accordance with their firstperson point of view, the presence of the avatar inside the visual scene permitted for measuring implicit thirdPLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.070488 January 20,4 Anchoring the Self for the Body in Bilateral Vestibular LossFig . Strategies for visuospatial perspectivetaking tasks (Experiment ). (A) Examples of visual stimuli applied for the tasks of implicit perspective taking (IPT), explicit viewpoint taking (EPT) job, and visuospatial manage (VSC) process. Visual stimuli presented a congruent or an incongruent viewpoint with the avatar with all the participant’s viewpoint. (B) Participants indicated no matter whether the amount of balls observed from their viewpoint (IPT and VSC tasks) matched (i.e matching trials) or did not match (i.e mismatching trials) the quantity presented in the instruction. doi:0.37journal.pone.070488.gPLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.070488 January 20,5 Anchoring the Self towards the Physique in Bilateral Vestibular Lossperson point of view taking (IPT), i.e. the extent to which the avatar’s viewpoint interfe.