Ech, and lexical access: the role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science. 1996; 7:226?1. Ravizza S. Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval? Psychonomic Bulletin Review. 2003; 10:610?. [PubMed: 14620354] Roustan, B.; Dohen, M. Gesture and speech coordination: the influence of the relationship between manual gesture and speech. Proceedings of Interspeech 2010, 11th annual conference of the international speech communication association; 2010. Schegloff, EA. On some gestures’ Pemafibrate side effects relation to talk. In: Atkinson, JM., editor. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 266-96. Schlenker P. Gestural presuppositions. 2014 To appear in Snippets. Seyfeddinipur, M. Meta-discursive gestures from Iran: some uses of the `Pistol Hand’. In: M ler, C.; Posner, R., editors. The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures; Proceedings of the Berlin Conference; Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag; 2004. p. 205-16. Seyfeddinipur, M. Reasons for documenting gestures and suggestions for how to go about it. In: Thieberger, Nicholas, editor. Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 147-65. Sherzer J. Verbal and nonverbal deixis: the pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language in Society. 1973; 2(1):117?1. So WC, Kita S, Goldin-Meadow S. Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science. 2009; 33(1):115?5. [PubMed: 20126430] Spaepen E, Coppola M, Flaherty M, Spelke E, Goldin-Meadow S. Generating a lexicon without a language model: do words for number count? Journal of Memory and Language. 2013; 69(4): 496?05. Streeck, J. Gesturecraft: the manufacture of meaning. The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing; 2009.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Linguist Compass. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 November 01.Abner et al.PageSwerts M, Krahmer E. Facial expression and prosodic prominence: effects of modality and facial area. Journal of Phonetics. 2008; 36(2):219?8. Talmy, L. Typology and process in concept structuring. Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Zeshan, U. Sign language in Indo-Pakistan: a description of a signed language. The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing; 2000.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptBiographiesNatasha Abner researches the linguistic structure of signed languages, including American Sign Language, French Sign Language, Nicaraguan Sign Language, and Nicaraguan homesign. A major focus of her work has been exploring how the linguistic VesnarinoneMedChemExpress OPC-8212 properties of signed languages can be understood as grammatical properties common to all human languages, signed or spoken. She also examines how linguistic properties unique to signed languages may have their origins in the visual-gestural modality of these languages and, consequently, may be shared with patterns observed in co-speech gesture. Since completing her postdoctoral work in the Psychology Department at the University of Chicago, Abner has served as an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at Montclair State University. She holds a PhD in Linguistics from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a BA in Linguistics from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Kensy Cooperrider’s research explores relationships between language, gesture, and cog.Ech, and lexical access: the role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science. 1996; 7:226?1. Ravizza S. Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval? Psychonomic Bulletin Review. 2003; 10:610?. [PubMed: 14620354] Roustan, B.; Dohen, M. Gesture and speech coordination: the influence of the relationship between manual gesture and speech. Proceedings of Interspeech 2010, 11th annual conference of the international speech communication association; 2010. Schegloff, EA. On some gestures’ relation to talk. In: Atkinson, JM., editor. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 266-96. Schlenker P. Gestural presuppositions. 2014 To appear in Snippets. Seyfeddinipur, M. Meta-discursive gestures from Iran: some uses of the `Pistol Hand’. In: M ler, C.; Posner, R., editors. The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures; Proceedings of the Berlin Conference; Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag; 2004. p. 205-16. Seyfeddinipur, M. Reasons for documenting gestures and suggestions for how to go about it. In: Thieberger, Nicholas, editor. Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 147-65. Sherzer J. Verbal and nonverbal deixis: the pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language in Society. 1973; 2(1):117?1. So WC, Kita S, Goldin-Meadow S. Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science. 2009; 33(1):115?5. [PubMed: 20126430] Spaepen E, Coppola M, Flaherty M, Spelke E, Goldin-Meadow S. Generating a lexicon without a language model: do words for number count? Journal of Memory and Language. 2013; 69(4): 496?05. Streeck, J. Gesturecraft: the manufacture of meaning. The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing; 2009.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Linguist Compass. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 November 01.Abner et al.PageSwerts M, Krahmer E. Facial expression and prosodic prominence: effects of modality and facial area. Journal of Phonetics. 2008; 36(2):219?8. Talmy, L. Typology and process in concept structuring. Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Zeshan, U. Sign language in Indo-Pakistan: a description of a signed language. The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing; 2000.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptBiographiesNatasha Abner researches the linguistic structure of signed languages, including American Sign Language, French Sign Language, Nicaraguan Sign Language, and Nicaraguan homesign. A major focus of her work has been exploring how the linguistic properties of signed languages can be understood as grammatical properties common to all human languages, signed or spoken. She also examines how linguistic properties unique to signed languages may have their origins in the visual-gestural modality of these languages and, consequently, may be shared with patterns observed in co-speech gesture. Since completing her postdoctoral work in the Psychology Department at the University of Chicago, Abner has served as an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at Montclair State University. She holds a PhD in Linguistics from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a BA in Linguistics from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Kensy Cooperrider’s research explores relationships between language, gesture, and cog.
Related Posts
Ncipals had been contacted and they requested the teachers' voluntary participation. We've got no facts
Ncipals had been contacted and they requested the teachers’ voluntary participation. We’ve got no facts about teachers who might have declined to participate. The inclusion criterion was a minimum of 2 years’ encounter of teaching adolescents in junior higher schools. With the 22 teachers who participated, 5 have been guys and 17 were girls. The […]
Ng occurs, subsequently the enrichments which are detected as merged broad
Ng happens, subsequently the enrichments which are detected as merged broad peaks within the control sample generally appear appropriately separated inside the resheared sample. In all of the images in Figure four that cope with H3K27me3 (C ), the significantly enhanced signal-to-noise ratiois apparent. In truth, reshearing features a significantly stronger impact on H3K27me3 than […]
F all somatic mutations were not detectable across every tumor region
F all somatic mutations were not detectable across every tumor region [10]. The major practical conclusion of this research was that (p. 883) intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development [10]. To be more precise, the […]