Er amounts indicating that personal gain was prioritized over Receiver’s

Er amounts indicating that personal gain was prioritized over Receiver’s pain). The task comprised a series of eight screens per trial across 20 trials. Each trial began with a screen displaying the running amount of the subject’s bank total (?0 on Trial 1) and current trial number. Subjects then had up to 11 s to decide upon and use a visual analogue scale (VAS) to select the amount of money they wanted to spend on that trial (up to ?) and thus the corresponding painful stimulation to be administered to the Receiver. This 11-s phase was partitioned into the `Decide’ and `Select’ periods. The Decide screen was presented for a fixed 3 s during which subjects were asked to think about their decision, so that when the select screen appeared, subjects could move the cursor to make their selection any time within the next 8 s. This design was used in order to introduce a variable jitter within the trial sequence. After making a selection, subjects saw a 3-s display of their choice before experiencing an 8-s anticipation phaseduring which subjects were told their choice was being transmitted over the internal network to the other testing laboratory where the Receiver was connected to the electric stimulation generator. Following this anticipation period, subjects viewed a 4-s video of the stimulation being administered (Video event) to the Receiver, or no stimulation if they had opted to spend the full ? permitted on a given trial. Subjects viewed a video feed of the Receiver’s hand during stimulation administration. Finally, subjects used a 13-point VAS to ratetheir distress levels on viewing the consequences of their decision, before viewing a 4-s inter-trial-interval. At the conclusion of the 20 trials, subjects were able to press a button to randomly multiply any remaining money L-660711 sodium salt web between 1 and 10 times, thus giving a maximum possible financial gain of ?00. (See Supplementary Materials for descriptions of the Imagine PvG and Non-Moral tasks.)Imaging methods MRI scanning was conducted at the Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit on a 3-Tesla Trio Tim MRI scanner by using a head coil gradient set. Whole-brain data were acquired with echoplanar T2*-weighted imaging (EPI), sensitive to BOLD signal contrast (48 sagittal slices, 3 mm thickness; Repetition Time (TR) ?2400 ms; Time to Echo (TE) ?30 ms; flip angle ?788; Field of View (FOV) ?192 mm). To provide for equilibration effects, the first seven volumes were discarded. T1-weighted structural images were acquired at a BLU-554MedChemExpress BLU-554 resolution of 1 ?1 ?1 mm. Statistical parametric mapping software was used to analyze all data. Pre-processing of fMRI data included spatial realignment, co-registration, normalization and smoothing. To control for motion, all functional volumes were realigned to the mean volume. Images were spatially normalized to standard space using the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template with a voxel size of 3 ?3 ?3 mm and smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with an isotropic full width at half maximum of 8 mm. InNeural basis for real moral decisionsaddition, high-pass temporal filtering with a cutoff of 128 s was applied to remove low-frequency drifts in signal. Statistical analysis After pre-processing, statistical analysis was performed using the general linear model (GLM). Analysis was carried out to establish each participant’s voxel-wise activation during the following events: making the decision of how much money to keep/which stimulations to administer (De.Er amounts indicating that personal gain was prioritized over Receiver’s pain). The task comprised a series of eight screens per trial across 20 trials. Each trial began with a screen displaying the running amount of the subject’s bank total (?0 on Trial 1) and current trial number. Subjects then had up to 11 s to decide upon and use a visual analogue scale (VAS) to select the amount of money they wanted to spend on that trial (up to ?) and thus the corresponding painful stimulation to be administered to the Receiver. This 11-s phase was partitioned into the `Decide’ and `Select’ periods. The Decide screen was presented for a fixed 3 s during which subjects were asked to think about their decision, so that when the select screen appeared, subjects could move the cursor to make their selection any time within the next 8 s. This design was used in order to introduce a variable jitter within the trial sequence. After making a selection, subjects saw a 3-s display of their choice before experiencing an 8-s anticipation phaseduring which subjects were told their choice was being transmitted over the internal network to the other testing laboratory where the Receiver was connected to the electric stimulation generator. Following this anticipation period, subjects viewed a 4-s video of the stimulation being administered (Video event) to the Receiver, or no stimulation if they had opted to spend the full ? permitted on a given trial. Subjects viewed a video feed of the Receiver’s hand during stimulation administration. Finally, subjects used a 13-point VAS to ratetheir distress levels on viewing the consequences of their decision, before viewing a 4-s inter-trial-interval. At the conclusion of the 20 trials, subjects were able to press a button to randomly multiply any remaining money between 1 and 10 times, thus giving a maximum possible financial gain of ?00. (See Supplementary Materials for descriptions of the Imagine PvG and Non-Moral tasks.)Imaging methods MRI scanning was conducted at the Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit on a 3-Tesla Trio Tim MRI scanner by using a head coil gradient set. Whole-brain data were acquired with echoplanar T2*-weighted imaging (EPI), sensitive to BOLD signal contrast (48 sagittal slices, 3 mm thickness; Repetition Time (TR) ?2400 ms; Time to Echo (TE) ?30 ms; flip angle ?788; Field of View (FOV) ?192 mm). To provide for equilibration effects, the first seven volumes were discarded. T1-weighted structural images were acquired at a resolution of 1 ?1 ?1 mm. Statistical parametric mapping software was used to analyze all data. Pre-processing of fMRI data included spatial realignment, co-registration, normalization and smoothing. To control for motion, all functional volumes were realigned to the mean volume. Images were spatially normalized to standard space using the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template with a voxel size of 3 ?3 ?3 mm and smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with an isotropic full width at half maximum of 8 mm. InNeural basis for real moral decisionsaddition, high-pass temporal filtering with a cutoff of 128 s was applied to remove low-frequency drifts in signal. Statistical analysis After pre-processing, statistical analysis was performed using the general linear model (GLM). Analysis was carried out to establish each participant’s voxel-wise activation during the following events: making the decision of how much money to keep/which stimulations to administer (De.