Amage the reputation of psychology as a discipline (e.g. Humphreys

Amage the reputation of psychology as a discipline (e.g. Humphreys, 1970). This issue is of particular relevance to e-health research, where data transmitted via the Internet and stored in remote servers can be easily compromised. As a result, some have suggested that a participant’s right to privacy and anonymity in an online research context cannot be subject to the same rules and regulations, as offline research and expectations should not be the same (Battles, 2010). Nonetheless, researchers have an ethical responsibility to take certain safeguards to protect participant data in e-health research. In the two studies presented here, participant privacy and confidentiality were addressed through the use of password-protected websites hosted on secure servers.Henderson, Law, Palermo, and EcclestonBest practice in e-health research is to follow a conservative approach by hosting websites on secure servers, using data encryption, and implementing password protection. Researchers need to be aware of the “sticky” nature of any data posted online (see Gutwirth, 2002 for an expanded discussion). Pan-RAS-IN-1 supplier Control over what data can be found when key terms are entered into a search engine, and control over upload and download of data, can only be guaranteed when using secure servers with websites hosted in one place only. As in face-to-face research, participant privacy and confidentiality can also be protected by de-identification of data. In Let’s Chat Pain, the message board rules specified that participants should not reveal their name, geographical location, or any other identifying information, and that a moderator would Oxaliplatin web delete any posts containing such information. In Web-MAP, participant responses were not accessible to anyone outside of the research team. Therefore, participant data were de-identified after data collection, as with face-to-face research.Participant SafetyProtecting participants from harm is central to the code of conduct of research and human rights organizations (e.g., American Psychological Association, 2010; United Nations, 1948; World Health Organisation, 2000; World Medical Association, 2008). It remains to be seen if the potential for harm with online research is the same as using traditional face-to-face research methods. Some researchers have argued that online methods offer a limited form of communication in which nonverbal information is largely missing (Fox et al., 2000). Nonverbal communication is an important part of the richness of communication from which researchers can determine emotional states. Online, participants can easily, and without warning, withdraw from the research process (D’Auria, 2011) or may take a different meaning from exchanges with research staff than intended (Fox et al., 2007), of which the researcher may be unaware. Moreover, bullying is of particular concern in e-health research that uses online focus groups hosted on message boards, as in Let’s Chat Pain. Key to participant protection from bullying is the establishment of expectations for participant behavior on the message board, strict moderation of participant comments, and removal of those who attempt to engage in bullying. In Let’s Chat Pain, the moderator enforced a series of “message board rules” about conduct on the message board. Specifically, participants were told they would be removed from the study if theybehaved in a way that deliberately upset others on the message board. Incidents which may have been considered to co.Amage the reputation of psychology as a discipline (e.g. Humphreys, 1970). This issue is of particular relevance to e-health research, where data transmitted via the Internet and stored in remote servers can be easily compromised. As a result, some have suggested that a participant’s right to privacy and anonymity in an online research context cannot be subject to the same rules and regulations, as offline research and expectations should not be the same (Battles, 2010). Nonetheless, researchers have an ethical responsibility to take certain safeguards to protect participant data in e-health research. In the two studies presented here, participant privacy and confidentiality were addressed through the use of password-protected websites hosted on secure servers.Henderson, Law, Palermo, and EcclestonBest practice in e-health research is to follow a conservative approach by hosting websites on secure servers, using data encryption, and implementing password protection. Researchers need to be aware of the “sticky” nature of any data posted online (see Gutwirth, 2002 for an expanded discussion). Control over what data can be found when key terms are entered into a search engine, and control over upload and download of data, can only be guaranteed when using secure servers with websites hosted in one place only. As in face-to-face research, participant privacy and confidentiality can also be protected by de-identification of data. In Let’s Chat Pain, the message board rules specified that participants should not reveal their name, geographical location, or any other identifying information, and that a moderator would delete any posts containing such information. In Web-MAP, participant responses were not accessible to anyone outside of the research team. Therefore, participant data were de-identified after data collection, as with face-to-face research.Participant SafetyProtecting participants from harm is central to the code of conduct of research and human rights organizations (e.g., American Psychological Association, 2010; United Nations, 1948; World Health Organisation, 2000; World Medical Association, 2008). It remains to be seen if the potential for harm with online research is the same as using traditional face-to-face research methods. Some researchers have argued that online methods offer a limited form of communication in which nonverbal information is largely missing (Fox et al., 2000). Nonverbal communication is an important part of the richness of communication from which researchers can determine emotional states. Online, participants can easily, and without warning, withdraw from the research process (D’Auria, 2011) or may take a different meaning from exchanges with research staff than intended (Fox et al., 2007), of which the researcher may be unaware. Moreover, bullying is of particular concern in e-health research that uses online focus groups hosted on message boards, as in Let’s Chat Pain. Key to participant protection from bullying is the establishment of expectations for participant behavior on the message board, strict moderation of participant comments, and removal of those who attempt to engage in bullying. In Let’s Chat Pain, the moderator enforced a series of “message board rules” about conduct on the message board. Specifically, participants were told they would be removed from the study if theybehaved in a way that deliberately upset others on the message board. Incidents which may have been considered to co.