Whether or not these effects are found across subpopulations. A consistent trend shows African American youth are more likely to be placed in kinship foster care than other populations (Smith Devore, 2004; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Researchers have theorized that the disproportionate placement of African American youth in kinship foster care relates to cultural assumptions and familial willingness such as large extended family networks of support. Indeed, African American families are more likely to rely on kin or fictive kin in times of need (Brown, Cohon, Wheeler, 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Additionally, others suggest kinship care represents a way to keep children in their families and communities (Bartholet, 2009). While there is evidence to suggest that high rates of child welfare service involvement in predominantly African American communities may adversely affect parental authority and neighborhood cohesion (Roberts, 2008), it is possible the desire to respond through use of kinship care may not be providing these youth with the best placement (Bartholet, 2009). Thus, it is important to identify whether or not this placement is more beneficial than traditional foster care settings for African American youth.Contextual Factors in Kinship Foster CareGiven its disproportionate use, research that identifies conditions under which kinship placements support the mental health of African American youth is especially important. Some researchers and advocates express concern that children being placed in kinship foster care move to homes similar to those from which they have been removed (Ehrle Geen,J Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPage2002). The apparent lack of resources in many kinship foster families may occur at multiple levels of contextual influence. A number of possible factors have been theorized but not empirically tested. On a broader scale, kinship homes tend to be in more chaotic neighborhoods than nonkinship homes (Berrick, 1997). Research indicates that children who live in impoverished neighborhoods exhibit worse mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and conduct disorder symptoms (Leventhal Brooks-Gunn, 2003; Meier, Slutske, Arndt, Cadoret, 2008). African American families may be more likely to accept the challenges of kinship care (Brown et al., 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008), but may also do so while PF-04418948 manufacturer experiencing extremely difficult economic hardships to the detriment of mental health outcomes. More PD150606 dose proximally, demographic characteristics of caregivers may also be relevant to children’s mental health. Many kinship caregivers are grandmothers, some of whom have health problems that come with old age (Iglehart, 1994; Raphel, 2008; Zinn, 2012). In a qualitative study examining what factors promoted or inhibited effective foster caregiving, kinship foster caregivers reported a significant age disparity (such as between a grandmother and a teenage child), which was a barrier to successful fostering (Coakley, Cuddeback, Buehler Cox, 2007). Another study of characteristics of caregiving environments based on a nationally representative sample found 75 of kinship caregivers were 40 years old or older and reported significantly worse physical health than nonkinship caregivers (Barth et al., 2008a). Old age and poor physical health of the caregiver may be stressors for children that predict better or poorer outcomes for kinshi.Whether or not these effects are found across subpopulations. A consistent trend shows African American youth are more likely to be placed in kinship foster care than other populations (Smith Devore, 2004; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Researchers have theorized that the disproportionate placement of African American youth in kinship foster care relates to cultural assumptions and familial willingness such as large extended family networks of support. Indeed, African American families are more likely to rely on kin or fictive kin in times of need (Brown, Cohon, Wheeler, 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Additionally, others suggest kinship care represents a way to keep children in their families and communities (Bartholet, 2009). While there is evidence to suggest that high rates of child welfare service involvement in predominantly African American communities may adversely affect parental authority and neighborhood cohesion (Roberts, 2008), it is possible the desire to respond through use of kinship care may not be providing these youth with the best placement (Bartholet, 2009). Thus, it is important to identify whether or not this placement is more beneficial than traditional foster care settings for African American youth.Contextual Factors in Kinship Foster CareGiven its disproportionate use, research that identifies conditions under which kinship placements support the mental health of African American youth is especially important. Some researchers and advocates express concern that children being placed in kinship foster care move to homes similar to those from which they have been removed (Ehrle Geen,J Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPage2002). The apparent lack of resources in many kinship foster families may occur at multiple levels of contextual influence. A number of possible factors have been theorized but not empirically tested. On a broader scale, kinship homes tend to be in more chaotic neighborhoods than nonkinship homes (Berrick, 1997). Research indicates that children who live in impoverished neighborhoods exhibit worse mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and conduct disorder symptoms (Leventhal Brooks-Gunn, 2003; Meier, Slutske, Arndt, Cadoret, 2008). African American families may be more likely to accept the challenges of kinship care (Brown et al., 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008), but may also do so while experiencing extremely difficult economic hardships to the detriment of mental health outcomes. More proximally, demographic characteristics of caregivers may also be relevant to children’s mental health. Many kinship caregivers are grandmothers, some of whom have health problems that come with old age (Iglehart, 1994; Raphel, 2008; Zinn, 2012). In a qualitative study examining what factors promoted or inhibited effective foster caregiving, kinship foster caregivers reported a significant age disparity (such as between a grandmother and a teenage child), which was a barrier to successful fostering (Coakley, Cuddeback, Buehler Cox, 2007). Another study of characteristics of caregiving environments based on a nationally representative sample found 75 of kinship caregivers were 40 years old or older and reported significantly worse physical health than nonkinship caregivers (Barth et al., 2008a). Old age and poor physical health of the caregiver may be stressors for children that predict better or poorer outcomes for kinshi.
Related Posts
In the heart, aiming to increase vascularisation. Further, we hypothesize that
In the heart, aiming to increase vascularisation. Further, we hypothesize that 5ML, by up-regulating CYP26B1 expression and CYP26B1 activity may reduce retinoic acid levels in the infarction area; that reduced retinoic acid levels lead to a reduction of pro-differentiation pressure in the tissue; and that a reduction of differentiation pressure leads to the activation of […]
Title Loaded From File
Tment only inside the CSCs (Fig 4B). Also, CQ inhibited pSTAT3-705, albeit, significantly less drastically than CQ-PTX treatment, only in CSCs of SUM159PT, although PTX alone showed no effects (Fig. 4B). In non-CSCs, pSTAT3-705 was up-regulated by CQ, PTX, and CQ-PTX. Regularly, the combination therapy also decreased the phosphorylation of STAT3 at S727 in CSCs […]
G are usually not able to decrease the expression lessen these expressions also as sumatriptan
G are usually not able to decrease the expression lessen these expressions also as sumatriptan administration (A,A1,B,B1,C,C1,D,D1). Information are representative of at the least lessen these expressions at the same time as sumatriptan administration (A,A1,B,B1,C,C1,D,D1). Data are representative of at least ## 3 independent experiments; one-way ANOVA test. 0.001 vs. sham; # p # p […]