M height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: completely defined by carinae, including transverse carina extending to spiracle. Propodeum background sculpture: mostly sculptured. Mediotergite 1 length/width at posterior margin: 1.4?.6. Mediotergite 1 shape: clearly widening towards posterior margin. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: mostly sculptured, excavated area centrally with transverse striation inside and/or a polished knob centrally on posterior MLN1117 biological activity margin of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 4.0?.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: more or less fully sculptured, with longitudinal striation. Outer margin of hypopygium: with a wide, medially folded, transparent, semi?desclerotized area; usually with 4 or more pleats. Ovipositor thickness: about same width throughout its length. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 0.8?.9. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.1?.3. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.4?.6. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.7?.8. Pterostigma length/width: 3.1?.5. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: about half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: more or less perpendicular to fore wing margin. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. Male. Unknown. Molecular data. Sequences in BOLD: 2, barcode compliant sequences: 2. Biology/ecology. Solitary. Host: malaise-trapped and Elachistidae, Antaeotricha sp. with ACG code 10-SRNP-55263. Distribution. Costa Rica, ACG. Comments. The vannal lobe is more like that of many species of Dolichogenidea, but the species is described as Apanteles based on other information. Etymology. We dedicate this species to Humberto L ez in recognition of his diligent efforts for the ACG Programa de Sectores. Apanteles impiger Muesebeck, 1958 http://species-id.net/wiki/Apanteles_impiger Fig. 75 Apanteles impiger Muesebeck, 1958: 437. Type locality. PUERTO RICO, Mayaguez. Holotype. , NMNH (examined). Description. Female. Body color: body mostly dark except for some sternites which may be pale. Antenna color: scape, pedicel, and flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): pale, pale, Biotin-VAD-FMK web partially pale/partially dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, pale. Tibiae color (pro-, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, mostly pale but with posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: entirely pale or transparent, translucent. Fore wing veins color: partially pigmented (a few veins may be dark but most are pale). Antenna length/body length: antenna about as longReview of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…as body (head to apex of metasoma); if slightly shorter, at least extending beyond anterior 0.7 metasoma length. Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 2.3?.4 mm. Fore wing length: 2.5?.6 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0?.2. Interocellar distance/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0?.2. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.9?.1. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.1?.3. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.6?.8. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 3.2?.3. Metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.4?.5. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with shallow, sparse punctures (separated by more.M height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: completely defined by carinae, including transverse carina extending to spiracle. Propodeum background sculpture: mostly sculptured. Mediotergite 1 length/width at posterior margin: 1.4?.6. Mediotergite 1 shape: clearly widening towards posterior margin. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: mostly sculptured, excavated area centrally with transverse striation inside and/or a polished knob centrally on posterior margin of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 4.0?.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: more or less fully sculptured, with longitudinal striation. Outer margin of hypopygium: with a wide, medially folded, transparent, semi?desclerotized area; usually with 4 or more pleats. Ovipositor thickness: about same width throughout its length. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 0.8?.9. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.1?.3. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.4?.6. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.7?.8. Pterostigma length/width: 3.1?.5. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: about half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: more or less perpendicular to fore wing margin. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. Male. Unknown. Molecular data. Sequences in BOLD: 2, barcode compliant sequences: 2. Biology/ecology. Solitary. Host: malaise-trapped and Elachistidae, Antaeotricha sp. with ACG code 10-SRNP-55263. Distribution. Costa Rica, ACG. Comments. The vannal lobe is more like that of many species of Dolichogenidea, but the species is described as Apanteles based on other information. Etymology. We dedicate this species to Humberto L ez in recognition of his diligent efforts for the ACG Programa de Sectores. Apanteles impiger Muesebeck, 1958 http://species-id.net/wiki/Apanteles_impiger Fig. 75 Apanteles impiger Muesebeck, 1958: 437. Type locality. PUERTO RICO, Mayaguez. Holotype. , NMNH (examined). Description. Female. Body color: body mostly dark except for some sternites which may be pale. Antenna color: scape, pedicel, and flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): pale, pale, partially pale/partially dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, pale. Tibiae color (pro-, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, mostly pale but with posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: entirely pale or transparent, translucent. Fore wing veins color: partially pigmented (a few veins may be dark but most are pale). Antenna length/body length: antenna about as longReview of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…as body (head to apex of metasoma); if slightly shorter, at least extending beyond anterior 0.7 metasoma length. Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 2.3?.4 mm. Fore wing length: 2.5?.6 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0?.2. Interocellar distance/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0?.2. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.9?.1. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.1?.3. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.6?.8. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 3.2?.3. Metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.4?.5. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with shallow, sparse punctures (separated by more.
Related Posts
Msds Of Octreotide Acetate
L, and within this mentoring system in certain, we had been serious about finding out how these mentors view the effect of diversity inside the mentor entee relationship. One respondent noted that it can be a lot easier to make analogies with persons who share a background similar for your own. So towards the extent […]
Ror neuron activity while participants make these race judgements). The authorsRor neuron activity when participants
Ror neuron activity while participants make these race judgements). The authorsRor neuron activity when participants make these race judgements). The authors also argue that the task with comics depicting physical causality with characters is really a socioperceptive activity, as there are correlations in between this as well as the emotion eyematching process. However it is […]
Vulnerable to wind.In the exact same time, our faces, jaws, and teeth progressivelyFrontiers in Human
Vulnerable to wind.In the exact same time, our faces, jaws, and teeth progressivelyFrontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.orgMarch Volume ArticleBressan and KramerBread and Mental Diseasebecame smaller sized in response towards the soft texture of bread (Larsen,).Thus we domesticated grain, and in return grain domesticated us (Murphy,).Yet the agricultural revolution may have spelled trouble.Tellingly, whenever diets primarily […]