Ients with AL amyloidosis, 15 normal controls) and blinded to the initial

Ients with AL amyloidosis, 15 normal controls) and blinded to the initial results by one investigator (DL). Interobserver variation was done on the same datasets by two observers (DL and KH). Reproducibility was assessed using Bland and Altman analysis.Data AnalysisData are presented as mean6standard deviation (SD) or median (quartiles), as appropriate. Differences on continuous data among 3 groups were compared using one-way order 11089-65-9 analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by either Tukeys or Games-Howell multiple comparison post hoc tests as appropriate. Serum level of NT-proBNP and Troponin T showed a significant skewed distribution, difference between groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney U-statistic test. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for the reduction of LSsys. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by 23727046 Mantel-Cox log-rank tests. The end point was date of death or heart transplantation during follow-up. The mortality hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using univariate proportionalhazards regression analysis. The major determinants of mortalityFigure 1. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with AL amyloidosis and LV hypertrophy. A (transverse T2 haste image) and B (short axis cine image) demonstrate left ventricular hypertrophy and minor pericardial effusion (dash arrow). C and D show late gadolinium enhancement images (short axis and horizontal long axis) presenting diffuse LE (solid arrows) in the left ventricular walls. LE: late enhancement; PE: pericardial effusion. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056923.gMyocardial Strain in Systemic Amyloidosis PatientsTable 4. Longitudinal peak systolic strain rate (LSRsys, s21).Controls n = 30 Septum Apical Mid Basal Lateral wall Apical Mid Basal Peptide M site Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the 42chamber view Inferior wall Apical Mid Basal Anterior wall Apical Mid Basal Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the 22chamber view Posterior wall Apical Mid Basal Anteroseptal wall Apical Mid Basal Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the apical long axis view 21.2660.34 21.0260.22{ 20.9460.19{ 21.2460.27 21.0860.31 21.2060.26 20.9660.13 21.3060.40 21.1060.28{ 21.2260.21 21.2460.51 21.1160.36 21.1660.40 21.0660.30 21.2160.33 21.1760.31 21.3560.27 21.2860.37 21.0960.23{ 20.9260.14{ 21.0460.Compensated group n = 18 21.3060.48 20.8060.27*{ 20.6060.24*{ 21.2760.44 21.0060.35 21.0160.52 20.9460.29 20.9960.37 20.8660.28* 20.9460.32* 20.9560.46 20.8260.34* 20.7860.41* 20.8060.27* 21.1360.37 20.9660.29 20.9260.33* 21.4460.53 20.9260.37{ 20.5460.27*{ 20.9260.Decompensated group n = 26 21.1860.47 15900046 20.5960.31*{{ 20.4160.25*{{ 21.1560.42 20.6860.29*{{ 20.4960.31*{{ 20.6860.28*{ 21.0060.52* 20.6160.34*{{ 20.6660.31*{ 21.2860.52 20.8160.38*{ 20.5860.29*{ 20.6960.29* 20.9860.42 20.6260.33*{{ 20.6460.29*{{ 21.2760.51 20.9660.42{ 20.5060.30*{1 20.7260.28*{*P,0.05 vs. Controls; { P,0.05 vs. Compensated group; { P,0.05 vs. apical; 1 P,0.05 vs. Mid. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056923.tHigh-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation regimen was more frequently used while oral melphalan plus prednisone regimen was less frequently applied in compensated group than in decompensated group. Cardiac associated clinical data and standard echocardiographic data of the cohort are presented in table 2, specific echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters were shown in table 3. Serum NT-proBNP was available in 20 patients [median (quartiles), compen.Ients with AL amyloidosis, 15 normal controls) and blinded to the initial results by one investigator (DL). Interobserver variation was done on the same datasets by two observers (DL and KH). Reproducibility was assessed using Bland and Altman analysis.Data AnalysisData are presented as mean6standard deviation (SD) or median (quartiles), as appropriate. Differences on continuous data among 3 groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by either Tukeys or Games-Howell multiple comparison post hoc tests as appropriate. Serum level of NT-proBNP and Troponin T showed a significant skewed distribution, difference between groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney U-statistic test. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for the reduction of LSsys. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by 23727046 Mantel-Cox log-rank tests. The end point was date of death or heart transplantation during follow-up. The mortality hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using univariate proportionalhazards regression analysis. The major determinants of mortalityFigure 1. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with AL amyloidosis and LV hypertrophy. A (transverse T2 haste image) and B (short axis cine image) demonstrate left ventricular hypertrophy and minor pericardial effusion (dash arrow). C and D show late gadolinium enhancement images (short axis and horizontal long axis) presenting diffuse LE (solid arrows) in the left ventricular walls. LE: late enhancement; PE: pericardial effusion. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056923.gMyocardial Strain in Systemic Amyloidosis PatientsTable 4. Longitudinal peak systolic strain rate (LSRsys, s21).Controls n = 30 Septum Apical Mid Basal Lateral wall Apical Mid Basal Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the 42chamber view Inferior wall Apical Mid Basal Anterior wall Apical Mid Basal Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the 22chamber view Posterior wall Apical Mid Basal Anteroseptal wall Apical Mid Basal Global LSRsys of the 6 segments in the apical long axis view 21.2660.34 21.0260.22{ 20.9460.19{ 21.2460.27 21.0860.31 21.2060.26 20.9660.13 21.3060.40 21.1060.28{ 21.2260.21 21.2460.51 21.1160.36 21.1660.40 21.0660.30 21.2160.33 21.1760.31 21.3560.27 21.2860.37 21.0960.23{ 20.9260.14{ 21.0460.Compensated group n = 18 21.3060.48 20.8060.27*{ 20.6060.24*{ 21.2760.44 21.0060.35 21.0160.52 20.9460.29 20.9960.37 20.8660.28* 20.9460.32* 20.9560.46 20.8260.34* 20.7860.41* 20.8060.27* 21.1360.37 20.9660.29 20.9260.33* 21.4460.53 20.9260.37{ 20.5460.27*{ 20.9260.Decompensated group n = 26 21.1860.47 15900046 20.5960.31*{{ 20.4160.25*{{ 21.1560.42 20.6860.29*{{ 20.4960.31*{{ 20.6860.28*{ 21.0060.52* 20.6160.34*{{ 20.6660.31*{ 21.2860.52 20.8160.38*{ 20.5860.29*{ 20.6960.29* 20.9860.42 20.6260.33*{{ 20.6460.29*{{ 21.2760.51 20.9660.42{ 20.5060.30*{1 20.7260.28*{*P,0.05 vs. Controls; { P,0.05 vs. Compensated group; { P,0.05 vs. apical; 1 P,0.05 vs. Mid. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056923.tHigh-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation regimen was more frequently used while oral melphalan plus prednisone regimen was less frequently applied in compensated group than in decompensated group. Cardiac associated clinical data and standard echocardiographic data of the cohort are presented in table 2, specific echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters were shown in table 3. Serum NT-proBNP was available in 20 patients [median (quartiles), compen.