Ined in culture by continuous subculturing.DNA sequence Title Loaded From File analysis of goat GLUT1 and GLUTThe analysis of the cDNA sequences was conducted using the computer program DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST site Table 1. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and RT-qPCR.Detection of GLUT1, GLUT12, sweet1 and amino acid transporters (AATs) gene expression by RT-qPCRTotal RNA from cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1GLUT1, pcDNA3.1-GLUT12 and pcDNA3.1 was obtained, and the 18S and 28S rRNA bands were evaluated following agarose gel electrophoresis. The GeneJETTM RNA Purification Kit (Fermentas) was used with oligo dT and 6-random primers to reverse-transcribe 5 mg of total RNA into cDNA. To determine the gene expression profiles, 2 mL of the cDNA was amplified in a 20 mL reaction mixture containing 10 mL SYBR PremixTM Ex Taq (TaKaRa China CA), 0.4 mL ROX dye II and specific primers (0.4 mM each of the forward and reverse gene-specific primer; Table. 1) using an ABI 7500 instrument. The data are reported as values normalized to the housekeeping gene (b-actin) to account for repeated measures. The differences between the means at each stage of development were determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.Primers names GLUT1-F GLUT1-R GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F GLUT12-R GLUT12-F1 GLUT12-R1 GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F2 GLUT12-R2 SWEET1-F SWEET1-R SLC1A5-F SLC1A5-R SLC7A5-F SLC7A5-R SLC3A2-F SLC3A2-R ?actin-F ?actin-RType Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward ReverseSequences 5′-GCTAGCATGGAGCCCACCAGCAAG -3′ 5′-AAGCTTTCACACTTGGGAATCAGCTCC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-GGAAAAGTGACCGCTCGTG-3′ 5′-TGTCCTGGTAGGCAAAGAACTG-3′ 5′-CTCGAGATGGTACCTGTTGAAAACGCAG -3′ 5′-CTCGAGTTAGATCTCTGAAGAAAGCTGC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-TACTCTCCTGTCGTCTGT-3′ 5′-ATGATGGTGGCTCTTCTC-3′ 5′-GTGCTCCTTCAGACTACA-3′ 5′-GTGGTGAGAGGTACATACT-3′ 5′-CCAAGGGACTCTCAAACATTTCA-3′ 5′-CGGAGGCTAGAACTTTCAAGAA-3′ 5′-ATCGCCGTCTCCTTCTGG-3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGGTCGCTTACG-3′ 5′-GCTGCTGCTGCTCTTCTG-3′ 5′-TGCCACCATCTCTGCTCTG-3′ 5′-CCAACCGTGAGAAGATGA-3′ 5′-CAGAGTCCATGACAATGC-3’Detection of glucose absorption and lactose synthesisThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were passaged at the same density in 6-well plates, and the cell culture medium and the total protein content of the cells were sampled at 24 h and 48 h. The glucose and lactose levels in the culture media were determined using the Glucose Assay Kit II and Lactose Assay Kit (Biovision, CA, USA), respectively. The absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 450 or 570 nm. The amount of absorbed glucose or lactose, as determined based on the difference before and after incubation, was expressed as mg of glucose/mg protein or ng of lactose/mg protein.Detection of GLUT1 and GLUT12 in GMGE cellsThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were grown on coverslips, fixed with 4 paraformaldehyde for 30 min Title Loaded From File anddoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065013.tFunctional Analysis of GLUT1 and GLUTFigure 1. Identification and construction of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 and pcDNA3.1-GLUT12. (A) Identification of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 by digestion with Nhe I and Hind III. 1676428 M1: DL5000 DNA Marker, pCG1: inserted into pcDNA3.1, pCG1 Nhe I + Hind III: digested with Nhe I and Hind III. (B) PCR analysis using primers GLUT1-F/GLUT1-R. M2.Ined in culture by continuous subculturing.DNA sequence analysis of goat GLUT1 and GLUTThe analysis of the cDNA sequences was conducted using the computer program DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST site Table 1. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and RT-qPCR.Detection of GLUT1, GLUT12, sweet1 and amino acid transporters (AATs) gene expression by RT-qPCRTotal RNA from cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1GLUT1, pcDNA3.1-GLUT12 and pcDNA3.1 was obtained, and the 18S and 28S rRNA bands were evaluated following agarose gel electrophoresis. The GeneJETTM RNA Purification Kit (Fermentas) was used with oligo dT and 6-random primers to reverse-transcribe 5 mg of total RNA into cDNA. To determine the gene expression profiles, 2 mL of the cDNA was amplified in a 20 mL reaction mixture containing 10 mL SYBR PremixTM Ex Taq (TaKaRa China CA), 0.4 mL ROX dye II and specific primers (0.4 mM each of the forward and reverse gene-specific primer; Table. 1) using an ABI 7500 instrument. The data are reported as values normalized to the housekeeping gene (b-actin) to account for repeated measures. The differences between the means at each stage of development were determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.Primers names GLUT1-F GLUT1-R GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F GLUT12-R GLUT12-F1 GLUT12-R1 GLUT1-F2 GLUT1-R2 GLUT12-F2 GLUT12-R2 SWEET1-F SWEET1-R SLC1A5-F SLC1A5-R SLC7A5-F SLC7A5-R SLC3A2-F SLC3A2-R ?actin-F ?actin-RType Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward Reverse Forward ReverseSequences 5′-GCTAGCATGGAGCCCACCAGCAAG -3′ 5′-AAGCTTTCACACTTGGGAATCAGCTCC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-GGAAAAGTGACCGCTCGTG-3′ 5′-TGTCCTGGTAGGCAAAGAACTG-3′ 5′-CTCGAGATGGTACCTGTTGAAAACGCAG -3′ 5′-CTCGAGTTAGATCTCTGAAGAAAGCTGC -3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGTTCTTCATCTTC-3′ 5′-CTCCTCAGGTGTCTTGTC-3′ 5′-TACTCTCCTGTCGTCTGT-3′ 5′-ATGATGGTGGCTCTTCTC-3′ 5′-GTGCTCCTTCAGACTACA-3′ 5′-GTGGTGAGAGGTACATACT-3′ 5′-CCAAGGGACTCTCAAACATTTCA-3′ 5′-CGGAGGCTAGAACTTTCAAGAA-3′ 5′-ATCGCCGTCTCCTTCTGG-3′ 5′-CTGGTTCTGGTCGCTTACG-3′ 5′-GCTGCTGCTGCTCTTCTG-3′ 5′-TGCCACCATCTCTGCTCTG-3′ 5′-CCAACCGTGAGAAGATGA-3′ 5′-CAGAGTCCATGACAATGC-3’Detection of glucose absorption and lactose synthesisThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were passaged at the same density in 6-well plates, and the cell culture medium and the total protein content of the cells were sampled at 24 h and 48 h. The glucose and lactose levels in the culture media were determined using the Glucose Assay Kit II and Lactose Assay Kit (Biovision, CA, USA), respectively. The absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 450 or 570 nm. The amount of absorbed glucose or lactose, as determined based on the difference before and after incubation, was expressed as mg of glucose/mg protein or ng of lactose/mg protein.Detection of GLUT1 and GLUT12 in GMGE cellsThe GT1-GMGE, GT12-GMGE and GMGE cells were grown on coverslips, fixed with 4 paraformaldehyde for 30 min anddoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065013.tFunctional Analysis of GLUT1 and GLUTFigure 1. Identification and construction of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 and pcDNA3.1-GLUT12. (A) Identification of pcDNA3.1-GLUT1 by digestion with Nhe I and Hind III. 1676428 M1: DL5000 DNA Marker, pCG1: inserted into pcDNA3.1, pCG1 Nhe I + Hind III: digested with Nhe I and Hind III. (B) PCR analysis using primers GLUT1-F/GLUT1-R. M2.
Related Posts
This suggests that episomal expression of PfSR1 is not obtained from the entire parasite population
ion of GalNAc-b3-GlcNAc-b4-Man-a-MU A large scale reaction was carried out using GlcNAc-b4-Man-a-MU that had been produced by Sussex Research Labs to make the final product GGM-MU. B3GALNT2dTM containing a 6xHis Tag was bound to metal affinity resin and added to 9 mM UDP-GalNAc and 9 mM GM-MU in 100 mM MES, pH 6.0, 10 mM […]
Mutation don't have any proliferative advantages compared with normal cells, as small PNH clones is
Mutation don’t have any proliferative advantages compared with normal cells, as small PNH clones is often discovered in healthier subjects; consequently, extra external events, including BMF onset, ought to take place to induce disease improvement and progression [106,109]. Proof shows the involvement of immune responses in triggering HSC destruction. Towards the very best of our […]
Cing T cell activation [110]. AntiCTLA4 antibodies could attach to their receptors (CTLA4/B7) on the
Cing T cell activation [110]. AntiCTLA4 antibodies could attach to their receptors (CTLA4/B7) on the surface of T cells, as a result enhancing T cells’ Iproniazid custom synthesis antitumor function via prolonging T cell activity [111]. Treg cells, as a suppressive component in the immune program, constitutively expresses CTLA4; consequently, the use of antiCTLA4 mAbs […]