Ch plot was bisected, with one half maintained using the original tillage method as the control and the other half converted to subsoiling, resulting in six treatment plots: HT and HT conversion to subsoiling (HTS); RT and RT conversion to subsoiling (RTS); and NT and NT conversion to subsoiling (NTS) in a split-plot design with threeFigure 1. The atmospheric temperature and precipitation at the experiment site. The data were collected by the agricultural meteorological station approximately 500 m from the experiment field. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.gTillage Conversion on CH4 and N2O EmissionsFigure 2. A to C CH4 flux variations of H, R, and N after subsoiling in different periods; D to F N2O flux variations of H, R, and N after subsoiling in different periods. a in Fig. 2 is the wheat growth stage of 2007 to 2008; b is the maize growth stage of 2008 to 2009; c is the wheat growth stage of 2008 to 2009. Arrows indicate time of subsoiling. Dotted lines distinguish the growth period of wheat and maize. * indicates P,0.05 and **indicates P,0.01 between subsoiling and the control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.gTable 1. GWP and total changes in CH4 and N2O after subsoiling (2008.10,2009.05).Treatments CH4 total purchase 94-09-7 emission (kg?ha21) GWP of CH4 (kgCO2 ?ha21) N2O total emission (kg?ha21) GWP of N2O (kgCO2 ?ha21) Total emissions of CH4 and N2O (kg?ha21) GWP of CH4 and N2O (kgCO2 ha21) Increased emissions after conversion (kg?ha21) Increased GWP after conversion (kgCO2 ?ha21)HTHTSRT 20.64 20.15 2.26 1662274 0.52 1.RTS 20.78 20.18 2.46 0.57 1.NT 20.39 20.09 1.46 0.35 1.NTS 20.52 20.12 2.67 0.61 2.20.73 20.84 20.17 20.19 2.14 0.49 1.41 2.42 0.56 1.0.32 ?0.37 0.0.37 ?0.39 0.0.26 ?0.49 1.surface temperature and the soil temperature at a depth of 5 cm were determined after collecting samples. The samples were measured using a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph. CH4 was measured using a flame ionization detector with a stainless steel chromatography column packed with a 5A molecular sieve (2 m long); the carrier gas was N2. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were 80uC, 100uC and 200uC, respectively. The total flow of the carrier gas was 30 ml min21, the H2 flow was 40 ml min21, and the airflow was 400 ml min21. N2O was measured using an electron capture detector with a Porapak-Q chromatography column (4 m long); the carrier gas was also N2. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were 45uC, 100uC and 300uC, respectively. The total flow of the carrier gas was 40 ml min21, and the tailblowing flow was 40 ml min21. The gas fluctuations were calculated by the gas concentration change in time per unit area. Emission changes in CH4 and N2O were calculated using the following formula [25]: F 60HMP dc 8:314(273zT) dt?0.?0.?0.Total emissions of CH4 and N2O (kg?ha21), N2O total emission flux added CH4 total emission flux; GWP of CH4 and N2O (kgCO2?ha21), GWP of N2O added GWP of CH4; Increased emissions after conversion (kg?ha21), difference of total emission of CH4 and N2O before and after conversion; Increased GWP after conversion (kgCO2?ha21), difference of GWP of CH4 and N2O before and after conversion. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.twhere F is the change in gas emission or uptake (mg?m22?h21); 60 is the conversion 23115181 MedChemExpress LIMKI-3 coefficient of minutes and hours; H is the height (m); M is the molar mass of gas (g?mol21); P is the atmospheric pressure (Pa); 8.314 is the Ideal Gas Constant (J mol21 K21); T is the average temperature in th.Ch plot was bisected, with one half maintained using the original tillage method as the control and the other half converted to subsoiling, resulting in six treatment plots: HT and HT conversion to subsoiling (HTS); RT and RT conversion to subsoiling (RTS); and NT and NT conversion to subsoiling (NTS) in a split-plot design with threeFigure 1. The atmospheric temperature and precipitation at the experiment site. The data were collected by the agricultural meteorological station approximately 500 m from the experiment field. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.gTillage Conversion on CH4 and N2O EmissionsFigure 2. A to C CH4 flux variations of H, R, and N after subsoiling in different periods; D to F N2O flux variations of H, R, and N after subsoiling in different periods. a in Fig. 2 is the wheat growth stage of 2007 to 2008; b is the maize growth stage of 2008 to 2009; c is the wheat growth stage of 2008 to 2009. Arrows indicate time of subsoiling. Dotted lines distinguish the growth period of wheat and maize. * indicates P,0.05 and **indicates P,0.01 between subsoiling and the control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.gTable 1. GWP and total changes in CH4 and N2O after subsoiling (2008.10,2009.05).Treatments CH4 total emission (kg?ha21) GWP of CH4 (kgCO2 ?ha21) N2O total emission (kg?ha21) GWP of N2O (kgCO2 ?ha21) Total emissions of CH4 and N2O (kg?ha21) GWP of CH4 and N2O (kgCO2 ha21) Increased emissions after conversion (kg?ha21) Increased GWP after conversion (kgCO2 ?ha21)HTHTSRT 20.64 20.15 2.26 1662274 0.52 1.RTS 20.78 20.18 2.46 0.57 1.NT 20.39 20.09 1.46 0.35 1.NTS 20.52 20.12 2.67 0.61 2.20.73 20.84 20.17 20.19 2.14 0.49 1.41 2.42 0.56 1.0.32 ?0.37 0.0.37 ?0.39 0.0.26 ?0.49 1.surface temperature and the soil temperature at a depth of 5 cm were determined after collecting samples. The samples were measured using a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph. CH4 was measured using a flame ionization detector with a stainless steel chromatography column packed with a 5A molecular sieve (2 m long); the carrier gas was N2. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were 80uC, 100uC and 200uC, respectively. The total flow of the carrier gas was 30 ml min21, the H2 flow was 40 ml min21, and the airflow was 400 ml min21. N2O was measured using an electron capture detector with a Porapak-Q chromatography column (4 m long); the carrier gas was also N2. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were 45uC, 100uC and 300uC, respectively. The total flow of the carrier gas was 40 ml min21, and the tailblowing flow was 40 ml min21. The gas fluctuations were calculated by the gas concentration change in time per unit area. Emission changes in CH4 and N2O were calculated using the following formula [25]: F 60HMP dc 8:314(273zT) dt?0.?0.?0.Total emissions of CH4 and N2O (kg?ha21), N2O total emission flux added CH4 total emission flux; GWP of CH4 and N2O (kgCO2?ha21), GWP of N2O added GWP of CH4; Increased emissions after conversion (kg?ha21), difference of total emission of CH4 and N2O before and after conversion; Increased GWP after conversion (kgCO2?ha21), difference of GWP of CH4 and N2O before and after conversion. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051206.twhere F is the change in gas emission or uptake (mg?m22?h21); 60 is the conversion 23115181 coefficient of minutes and hours; H is the height (m); M is the molar mass of gas (g?mol21); P is the atmospheric pressure (Pa); 8.314 is the Ideal Gas Constant (J mol21 K21); T is the average temperature in th.
Related Posts
The part of T as a T helper epitope in the antibody response to (NANP)six elicited by immunization with T1BT or T1BT-Y was corroborated by a lack of antibody responses in DR4 transgenic mice immunized with T1B (Table three)
). Finally, getting identified that QNTY exhibited a higher affinity for DR4, we sought to examine the impact on the L335Y adjust at P1 on the kinetic stability in the DR4/QNT-Y complex at the same time as the sensitivity of this peptide complicated to HLA-DM editing. We observed a ,25-fold raise within the half-life of […]
Ents, of getting left behind’ (Bauman, 2005, p. two). Participants have been, having said that, keen
Ents, of becoming left behind’ (Bauman, 2005, p. 2). Participants were, nevertheless, keen to note that on-line connection was not the sum total of their social interaction and contrasted time spent on the internet with social activities journal.pone.0169185 literacies which can assistance creative interaction using digital media, as highlighted by Guzzetti (2006). That care leavers […]
Vations inside the sample. The influence measure of (Lo and Zheng, 2002), henceforth LZ, is
Vations inside the sample. The influence measure of (Lo and Zheng, 2002), henceforth LZ, is defined as X I b1 , ???, Xbk ?? 1 ??n1 ? :j2P k(4) Drop variables: Tentatively drop every single variable in Sb and recalculate the I-score with one variable much less. Then drop the one that gives the highest […]